Practitioners of Open Pedagogy generally recommend that students have agency in their choice of license for a class project. This means they should be educated on the nuances of the license and what that means for how their work can be used in the future. In addition, they should have a choice in the matter of which license is selected. And that choice should not impact their ability to complete the assignment for class credit.<\/p>\n
Key questions to consider:<\/p>\n
In a recent event at Rebus Community, we spoke with Robin DeRosa, chair of interdisciplinary studies at Plymouth State University, Steel Wagstaff, instructional technology consultant at UW-Madison, and Amanda Coolidge, senior manager of Open Education at BCcampus, about their experiences working with students to create open textbooks<\/p>\n
The three talked about pedagogy, faculty responsibilities, student rights, and agreements when students work on open textbooks and OER projects.<\/p>\n
One of the key threads that emerged was the need for students to have agency over their choice of license\u2013meaning they\u2019re not forced into an open license without understanding what it is, and the alternatives.<\/p>\n
Robin said she handles this by giving her students choices: They can choose whether to openly license their work or not, and if they do choose an open license, they can choose which license to use. (But if their chosen license is not compatible with the other licenses, their contributions may not get into the finished book, she said, citing the more restrictive CC ND license as one example.)<\/p>\n
Robin said over the three courses in which she has focused on open, she has only had one student keep their coursework fully private inside the LMS.<\/p>\n
\u201cI don\u2019t think there\u2019s any problem giving them all of that choice. It only works to reinforce the Open Pedagogy, which is that you are in the driver\u2019s seat and you have control over what you do,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n
Steel also mentioned the students\u2019 intellectual property rights (i.e. copyright) to what they create.<\/p>\n
\u201cIn part I think Open Pedagogy is empowering them to say, \u2018hey this is your content. What do you want to do with it?\u2019\u201d Steel said.<\/p>\n
When publishing an openly licensed book, he said, \u201cour strategy was that we wanted to obtain consensus on the license.\u201d<\/p>\n
He also talked with students about the attribution component of the license and encouraged students to think about how they wanted their work to be cited and attributed.<\/p>\n
Steel noted that students should be able to choose not to use the open license and still get credit for the course and meet its educational goals.<\/p>\n
Amanda said Open Pedagogy provides a great opportunity to teach digital literacy to students around the concept of openness.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat does it mean to contribute back to the public good, and is that something you want to do or is that something you feel restricted by?\u201d<\/p>\n